[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Schematron Best Practice: A Schematron schema's area ofresponsibility?
- From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- To: "'Rick Jelliffe'" <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:29:35 -0500
If the system is sensitive to the time coupling of type creation and type
validation, no. If not, yes. To put it another way, I can type in XML
instances and an XML provider consumes them. I do that when I am mocking up
screens and haven't decided how the tables should break down yet (document
oriented screen design). So here, the schema is meaningless.
OTOH, when I make a dataset in ASP, Visual Studio creates an XSD. I never
see it. Who uses it?
len
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:rjelliffe@allette.com.au]
So when considering efficiency, are systems that promote, in
effect, no validation actually more "efficient" than systems that promote
effective partial validation...
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]