XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema and the Unique Particle Attribution (UPA) rule

Or use RNG ;-)
 
http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/relax-CHP-7-SECT-2.html [Erik van der Vlist, why you should]
http://www.simonstl.com/articles/sanity/relaxngSchema.html [Simon St. Laurent, why you can't]
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/02/11/relaxtron.html [Eddie Robertsson, what it doesn't do]
 
Leigh.
 


From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@saxonica.com]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 2:32 PM
To: 'Azariah Jeyakumar'; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema and the Unique Particle Attribution (UPA) rule

This is a feature often requested in XML Schema called "cooccurrence constraints". It can't be done in XML Schema 1.0, unless you are prepared to change your <type> element into an xsi:type attribute. It will be possible in XML Schema 1.1, but that's still in the future.
 
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
 
...


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS