OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] The year is 2027, and we need to examine archived XML documents from 2007 ...

Given that XML became possible only once the costs of memory and CPUs
dropped, the power increased and UNICODE became available, another way to
look at the question is to ask if anything lower in the stack (say hardware
or other language standards) might change such that XML becomes obsolete the
way that SGML did.  XML simplified SGML.   What might change to make XML
become 'too hard'?  With XML, a sort of rabbit trail was left back to SGML
through Clark's XML/SGML Declaration although I don't know of anyone using
it yet.   If changes did occur, what would be the XML rabbit trail?

Since this is a speculative question, one might want to consider all the
possible changes.  For example, if the researcher does manage to get memory
to work in the third dimension (the racetrack), and density takes another
quantum leap forward, or quantum computing becomes practical, what changes
might occur?  As the costs of the iron go down and the power increases, the
code practices become sloppier and programmers begin to do less 'to the
metal' work.  One might consider that as the user/machine interface became
more intelligent, less rigor could be required in the instructions.  In
2027, the entity looking at dredging up the XML might not be a human.  It
might be the case that the rabbit trail consists of little bridges the
humans were adding to ensure data goes forward just as markup was added
(metadata can be seen as a bridge among islands of certainty).


From: Tim.Bray@Sun.COM [mailto:Tim.Bray@Sun.COM] 

Maybe I'm missing something, but XML feels like a safer long-term bet  
to me if only because almost all those tools are (a) open-source, and  
(b) written in mainstream languages and (c) written for  
portability.   So you won't get the situation you get in some IT  
shops I've seen where a horrible old PDP-11 or Unisys box is kept  
limping along at great expense because they occasionally need some  
long-forgotten black-box proprietary app.  I.e., whatever it is we  
call a "computer" in 2027 will probably run libxml2 and Jing just  
fine.  -T

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS