[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
- From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@mclink.it>
- To: "'Richard Tobin'" <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:11:40 -0400
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@inf.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 16:25
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute
> accent should require two bytes, right?
>
> In article <003e01c801fc$9df86ff0$8901a8c0@aldebaran> you write:
>
> >It is not correct to say that a Unicode character can be either an
> >"ASCII character" or a "non-ASCII character". It is better
> to say that
> >some Unicode characters (those with codes below 128) have a
> >corresponding character in ASCII.
>
> On what do you base this assertion? Why do you think the
> ASCII characters are not the same characters that appear in
> Unicode?
That's not what I said nor what I think.
Alessandro
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]