[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
- From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@mclink.it>
- To: "'Bill Kearney'" <wkearney99@hotmail.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:11:48 -0400
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Kearney [mailto:wkearney99@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 14:43
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute
> accent should require two bytes, right?
>
> Alessandro Triglia wrote:
> > It is not correct to say that a Unicode character can be either an
> > "ASCII character" or a "non-ASCII character". It is better to say
> > that some Unicode characters (those with codes below 128) have a
> > corresponding character in ASCII.
> >
> Who said anything about ASCII? That just muddies up the water.
The whole discussion is about Unicode and ASCII! It started with the
following sentence in Roger's document: "Here is a simple XML document.
Most of its characters are ASCII, but there is one non-ASCII character, the
é character"
Alessandro
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]