XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: Element equivalence under XML Namespaces

Matthew Van Gundy <matt-xmldev@shekinahstudios.com> writes:

> Would any XML/Namespaces guru be willing to answer the following
> question for me?  Is the following a well-formed XML document:
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <doc xmlns="http://foo.com/foo";>
>   <foo:elem xmlns:foo="http://foo.com/foo";>
>   </elem>
> </doc>

My reading of the specs says it is not.  XML Namespaces only applies
to XML documents, which requires well-formedness as defined in the XML
spec.  Since the string "foo:elem" does not match the string "elem",
this is not an XML document, so XML Namespaces does not apply to it.

-- 
Jaakko Kangasharju, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology
Happiness is warm feet



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS