XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Element equivalence under XML Namespaces

>
> No, it's not. Well-formedness is defined in the XML specification, and this
> doesn't know anything about namespaces;

Not exactly, it knows some things about Namespaces but not enough to
specify semantic matching - I think it's sort of weird that. Things
that it knows that I can remember:

1. : should be used in definition of namespaces.

2. XML or xml is reserved. I don't think xmlns is defined as a
namespace declaration anywhere but it seems sort of implied.

Cheers,

Bryan Rasmussen


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS