Re: [xml-dev] Element equivalence under XML Namespaces

[richard@inf.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin)]

In article <9C4AFAA5-8048-4065-93DF-6ED37F94353A@joost.com> you write:

>Any casing of "xml" being reserved isn't necessarily namespaces  
>related, it also allows the introduction of future features with  
>specific semantics (as happened with the belated xml:id).

xml:id does use "xml" as the (automatically-bound) namespace prefix.
But there's also <?xml-stylesheet?> which doesn't use namespace
syntax because PI names aren't namespaced.

-- Richard