XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] =?utf-8?Q?=22XML?= is just =?utf-8?Q?syntax=22?= versus =?utf-8?Q?=22Use?= semantic =?utf-8?Q?markup=22?= (Is this a paradox?)

I would just like to point out that hierarchical structures also have a powerful semantic capability based on solid hierarchical structure processing principles. More important than using this capability is the penalty paid for ignoring the hierarchical structure semantics- wrong answers. If you are going to attach semantics to markup, you can’t ignore the hierarchical structure semantics that exists between the pathways of the structure being referenced or your results may not be meaningful. And yes, this is Lowest Common Ancestor (LCA) processing again; it applies to full search too. In the case of markup vs database data, markup can have variable LCAs to account for // navigation. There should be at least a best practices document that covers hierarchical structure processing for XML to keep results more consistent, correct and meaningful.

 

    /Mike

 

Michael M David



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS