XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re:overriding the schema at runtime..

There's no real way to override processContents="strict".  I think you just 
have to accept that the schema contains a bug in it.  As it happens using 
processContents = 'skip' is also the right way to go for including elements 
with namespaces.

One other thing, I've seen some reports of processors having problems with 
schemas that specify specific, but high values for maxOccurs (e.g. 50 as 
opposed to unbounded).  This is because they try to build a state machine 
with as many states as maxOccurs dictates.  I'm not sure at the point where 
the problems start arising, so maybe 50 is OK.  Just thought I'd mention it 
as something to bear in mind!

HTH,

Pete Cordell
Codalogic
For XML C++ data binding visit http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "dave" <ceek63@yahoo.com>
To: <user@xmlbeans.apache.org>; <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 5:44 PM
Subject: [xml-dev] overriding the schema at runtime..


>
> Is it possible to override the w3c XSD at runtime?
> For e.g., I would like to make 'processContents' =
> Skip or Lax instead of Strict in the following schema
> during run time:
> <xs:complexType name="ExtType">
> <xs:sequence>
>    <xs:any namespace="##any" processContents="strict"
> minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="50"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:complexType>
>
>
> In other words, I am trying to avoid changing the
> schema and thus create a new schema version just for
> this small change. I primarily introduced 'ExtType'
> above for schema extension so that any further changes
> (like application specific) to the schema using this
> part should not affect the validation. I tried adding
> an extra element (both with and without namespace)
> using the above type and the schema validation failed.
> Finally found out that making processContents = 'skip'
> is the solution to introduce any new application
> specific elements with no namespace.
>
>
>
> -D
>
>
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster 
> Total Access, No Cost.
> http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
> 




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS