[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
- From: Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com>
- To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:30:00 -0500
This isn't even hard. XML is a metalanguage.
I don't disagree about validating in the business logic.
len
From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@redhat.com]
But I'm not sure what the original comment was intended to convey. In
what way is XML not a single language? There's essentially one markup
language called XML. Is it not a single language because DTDs, W3C XML
Schemas, and schemaless docs are all in widespread use, Relax-NG is
popular with the cool crowd, and Those Who Know rely on Schematron?
You know, a bunch of people I know look at this fragmentation and
conclude that it's best to do validation at the business level by
writing code. Creating more schema languages doesn't convince them to
rely more on schemas and less on code.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]