[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Convention versus standard
- From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@googlemail.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:12:47 +0100
I agree. Perhaps it would be better to use the terms 'COMMON practice'
and 'BEST practice' rather than 'convention' (the association seems
more intuitive as does the distinction) ?
Fraser.
2008/7/21 Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 01:04:09PM -0400, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
>> Is a convention the same thing as a best practice?
> No, not in general. Things that are "usually done" or that are
> done by most people are not necessarily the best way to do
> things or even good things to do.
>
> Liam
>
> --
> Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
> http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]