|
Hmm, it looks like perhaps the
syntax has use in some cases, but what I see is that it appears to need
more syntactical characters than the XML instance - ie a little
cumbersome. Advantage is probably its function-oriented syntax, which
eases implementation and understanding during programming. I'm experimenting with a WYSIWUG syntax like: x = <!--xml <car year="2008"> <model>Prius</model> </car> xml-->; https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=2197744&forum_id=861535 Regards, Chin Chee-Kai Andrew Welch wrote: 74a894af0809080602y38afc5ebu7d32b050724b079d@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">Just stumbled across this: http://www.ociweb.com/mark/programming/WAX.html Here's an example from that page, which demonstrates its method chaining approach: wax.start("car").attr("year", 2008).child("model", "Prius").close(); creates: <car year="2008"> <model>Prius</model> </car> ...which is nice. |