OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Tradeoffs of XML encoding by enclosing all content in CDATA blocks

2008/9/30 Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>:
> Hash: SHA1
> I seem to be in the minority, but I think using CDATA-sections is
> entirely reasonable when inserting large amounts of textual material
> in an XML document.  Note I said 'textual material' -- this _does_
> often contain ampersands, but close-enought-to-never contains the
> catastrophic ]]>.  The same observation does _not_, of course, apply
> to large amounts of binary data.

Isn't the point though, that you can insert large amounts of "textual
material" into the in-memory version of the XML as a text node and
then let the serializer deal with it as normal.

It's only when you insert that textual material into the serlized form
of the XML that you need to worry about using a cdata section...

That's right isn't it?

Andrew Welch
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS