XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Do Schema-code binding tools typically ignore user-defined simple types?

Title: Do Schema-code binding tools typically ignore user-defined simple types?

In your experience with tools that generate code from XML schemas, do they typically respect, or ignore, user-defined simple types, like length restrictions on xsd:string?

I'm currently reading Thomas Erl's new book, "Web Service Contract Design & Versioning for SOA", where he makes the statement that "most" tools ignore them.  I believe this would result in code-driven validation of XML documents ignoring issues with element values outside of the defined length restrictions.  I believe almost everything Thomas Erl tells me :) , but I'd really like to see some more support for this statement before I believe it.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS