RE: [xml-dev] M as the next XML?

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
To: "'Richard Salz'" <rsalz@us.ibm.com>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:13:05 -0500

Revenge of the curly.  { and ; kick < and "'s butt.

More basic data types coupled a little more strongly to the syntax to
achieve a smarter pipeline.

Rick Jeliffe is right.  

len


From: Richard Salz [mailto:rsalz@us.ibm.com] 

Any comments on this blog entry?
        http://blog.jclark.com/2009/03/getting-involved-with-m.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] M as the next XML?
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

References:
- M as the next XML?
  - From: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]