XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?

>> First an example of a business rule:
>>
>>     A Level 1 manager has a maximum signature
>>     authority of $10K.
>>
>>
>>     An auto loan applicant, living in Ohio, is
>>     underage if he/she is under 18 years of age.
>>
>>     If a customer has no outstanding invoices,
>>     then the customer is of preferred status.
>>
>
> I agree those are business rules and are best kept out of a schema.
>
> What's more difficult are rules like "Every branch of the bank has a branch
> manager" - that's on the borderline between structural rules and business
> rules.

I've often wondered where you draw the line - do you check everything
possible in the xsd, or only in the application, or both.

There doesn't seem to be a simple answer, but a rough guide is: if you
don't want "branch manager" to ever be null, check it in the schema.
If however, you want a nice error message instead of one mentioning
"invalid content" and "complex type" then let it through to the app.



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS