[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?
- From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- To: "'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@mitre.org>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:36:57 +0100
>
> What is a "structural rule?"
>
> In XML Schema 1.0 the answer was clear: anything that
> required computation, if-then-else logic, inference, and
> co-constraints could not be placed in XML Schema, and was
> therefore placed in Schematron) All rules were expressed and
> managed by Schematron.
No, I think that's post-hoc rationalisation. I don't think the split between
structural rules and business rules equates at all closely to the split
between grammar and predicates. You can say in XSD that a manager must have
at least five employees, which is definitely a business rule (and a bad
one); but it takes Schematron to say that a paragraph cannot appear nested
within another paragraph unless there is an intervening table, which is in
my book a structural rule - if indeed there is a black-and-white
distinction, which I doubt. The world is fuzzy.
Regards,
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]