[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: Fwd: [xml-dev] Word of the day: upconversion
- From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- To: "'Jim Tivy'" <jimt@bluestream.com>,"'Dave Pawson'" <davep@dpawson.co.uk>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:46:19 +0100
ion
>
> How about an upconversion spectrum like:
>
> noise --> human readable ---> machine readable
>
> Of course it does beg the question about what machine
> readable means - do machines read - what does it mean to say
> something is machine readable.
I think what is really happening is that external knowledge of the rules
governing the structure of the text is being translated into an internal
(in-band) representation of the structure at the instance level. No new
information is being created: it's just being made more digestible.
Regards,
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]