XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Modular schemas.

 
> does my idea of massive usage of substitutionGroup sound like 
> a good idea, to modularize and ease the patching of my 
> schemas in the future?

I couldn't really work out in detail what you were planning to do. I'm
afraid that creating schemas capable of being customized is always hard
work.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay 

> 
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Michael Kay 
> <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, this schema is invalid : It is illegal to create an 
> >> empty "optionalAttribute_elements" group.
> >> What is the correct way to define a group that contains 
> nothing? or 
> >> just text?
> >>
> >
> > <xs:group name="optionalAttribute_elements">
> >  <xs:sequence/>
> > </xs:group>
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Michael Kay
> > http://www.saxonica.com/
> > http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
> >
> >



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS