XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Re: xml-dev Digest 24 Mar 2010 11:49:31 -0000 Issue 2307

> I disagree that this specifies the order of execution.
> 
> >>  example 3: for i in 1..length(array) yield function(a[i])
> 
> The results must be in order but the execution need not.
> 

Well, that depends on the semantics of the language in which it's written,
which we don't know. Many procedural languages have syntax a bit like this,
and allow function() to have side-effects such as changing global variables,
and in such a case it's quite plausible that the language semantics would
require sequential execution. On the other hand many functional languages
also have similar constructs, and don't allow function() to have
side-effects, and don't mandate sequential execution.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS