XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Data Interoperability ... Why do some XML vocabulariesspecify meaning + behavior whereas others specify only meaning?

On 18/08/2010 21:46, Michael Kay wrote:
> With XSLT it's a little less likely that anyone would do anything very
> useful with a stylesheet other than execute it, but it's certainly a
> theoretical possibility.

Although one of the main reasons that xslt is xml is so that it can be 
used as source data rather than being executed (often so that it can be 
transformed by another xslt stylesheet).

David



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS