RE: When the required output data can't be produced with a tool,does it

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

RE: When the required output data can't be produced with a tool,does it indicate the XML document is poorly designed or a new tool is needed?

From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:08:22 -0400

Hi Folks,

How does one identify a well designed XML document? Is XML design simply a matter of aesthetics; or, are there solid engineering/scientific/mathematical principles behind good XML design?

How does one identify the right tool to process XML documents? Is tool selection simply a matter of using whatever tool happens to be available; or, are there engineering/scientific/mathematical principles behind the selection of tools for processing XML documents?


/Roger

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] RE: When the required output data can't be producedwith a tool, does it indicate the XML document is poorly designed or a newtool is needed?
  - From: Jonas Mellin <jonas.mellin@his.se>

References:
- When the required output data can't be produced with a tool, doesit indicate the XML document is poorly designed or a new tool is needed?
  - From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]