[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] nextml
- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:14:26 +0000
> XML took 2 years (most of it was done in the first year).
>
> These days it does take longer at W3C, although you could get a spec
> done in 2 or 3 years, and you can get a draft out in a much shorter
> time.
I don't think you can get a significant spec done fast in W3C these
days, especially one that tramples all over the space covered by
existing specs. There are too many people who will want a say, and they
will all slow you down. How long did XProc take? To do things fast, you
need a small organization with a small number of stakeholders, and you
need to be willing to accept that if you get it wrong, the world will
simply ignore you. W3C is culturally indisposed to take that risk.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]