>> ...I think everyone takes "XML" to mean "XML 1.0 + XML Namespaces" so
>> to say something is a "subset of XML" but not mean namespaces you
>> might get done for false advertising :)
>
> May I suggest that this discussion might be more productive if:
>
> - "everyone" is taken to mean "I"
It's true, when I refer to "XML" I really do mean XML 1.0 + XML
Namespaces, and not just XML without namespaces.
But then, so does *everyone* else, and it's absolutely ridiculous to
suggest otherwise.
Funny. I think results in this particular thread indicate that you might have that "ridiculous" bit backwards.
Nevertheless, I'm leaving off that particular debate. It's not really important, and I don't think it pragmatically affects the MicroXML proposal.
