XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] MicroXML



On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:
On Dec 15, 2010, at 23:10, James Clark wrote:

> I believe the standard should provide a parsing mode (and a way of triggering that parsing mode) that does not attempt to be 100% backwards compatible with bizarre and confusing browser bugs.

Who would this benefit and how? If you write valid HTML, you don't hit this stuff.

I want it to be valid HTML (in standards mode) to supply an end-tag for any element (including <br>) ie if <x/> is valid, then <x></x> is valid.

I would also like it to be valid HTML (in standards mode) to use empty element syntax for any element with empty content (I suspect this is more problematic) ie if <x></x> is valid, then <x/> should be valid.

This would simplify things for authors and for software generating HTML.  It would also facilitate polyglot markup.

James



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS