Re: [xml-dev] Micro XSD for Micro XML?

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:45:50 +0000

On 16/12/2010 14:43, Stephen Green wrote:
> Now we have 'Micro XML', can't have a Micro XML Schema (Micro XSD)?
>

The winning combination, I would think, would be a combination of 
RelaxNG for grammatical constraints, XPath assertions for 
predicate-based constraints, and data types based on Jeni Tennison's 
DataType Library Language [1]

Michael Kay
Saxonica

[1] http://www.jenitennison.com/datatypes/

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] Micro XSD for Micro XML?
  - From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] Micro XSD for Micro XML?
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Re: [xml-dev] Micro XSD for Micro XML?
  - From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Micro XSD for Micro XML?
  - From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Micro XSD for Micro XML?
  - From: John Madden <john.madden@duke.edu>

References:
- Micro XSD for Micro XML?
  - From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]