RE: [xml-dev] JSONx sent to the IETF

["David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com>]

XMLj is the obvious choice for a name.

Seriously though, I think this is good to be published.  I shyed away from
JSONx because it was copyrighted to IBM and I didn't want to deal with an
army of lawyers.   I dont personally like how JSON objects and members are
combined into one XML object, its not a "clean" mapping of XML to JSON,
IMHO,
plus it doesn't handle non XML character data well (say NUL's) ... but
overall I think its a good thing to have a standard then none in this area.


----------------------------------------
David A. Lee
dlee@calldei.com
http://www.xmlsh.org


-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@ccil.org] On Behalf Of John Cowan
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:06 PM
To: Richard Salz
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] JSONx sent to the IETF


Richard Salz scripsit:

> We've published JSONx, the XML/JSON mapping some IBM products use, as 
> an IETF draft.                                                        

Cool.  What is not cool, however, is the name.  It is boring,
unmnemonic, ... in short, IBM.  Can it be changed?

-- 
Winter:  MIT,                                   John Cowan
Keio, INRIA,                                    cowan@ccil.org
Issue lots of Drafts.                           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
So much more to understand!
Might simplicity return?                        (A "tanka", or extended
haiku)

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php