XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] XML Namespaces 1.1

Original Message From: "Rick Yorgason"
> On 25/05/2011 4:28 AM, Pete Cordell wrote:
>> So that makes me think, in the IETF they have Experimental RFCs, which
>> are proposals whose impact on the net are not obvious. Maybe the W3C
>> should do something similar. The implications of an Experimental
>> Recomendation would be "We understand that people are interested in
>> doing something in this area, and if you want to do something then we
>> suggest doing this. But you do so at your own risk."
>
> Actually, if the W3C won't do it, I suppose you could try to submit your 
> proposals to the IETF.  I wonder how much resistance there would be to 
> such a thing...

The W3C and the IETF had quite a bit of discussion about who should develop 
HTTP many years back so they probably got quite a fixed idea about who owns 
what turf!

Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info
Twitter: http://twitter.com/petecordell



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS