Re: [xml-dev] Error and Fatal Error

On 17 July 2011 10:20, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> wrote:

Here are some excerpts from XML specification itself.

<quote>
error: A violation of the rules of this specification; results are
undefined. Unless otherwise specified, failure to observe a
prescription of this specification indicated by one of the keywords
MUST, REQUIRED, MUST NOT, SHALL and SHALL NOT is an error. Conforming
software MAY detect and report an error and MAY recover from it.

fatal errors: An error which a conforming XML processor MUST detect
and report to the application. After encountering a fatal error, the
processor MAY continue processing the data to search for further
errors and MAY report such errors to the application. In order to
support correction of errors, the processor MAY make unprocessed data
from the document (with intermingled character data and markup)
available to the application. Once a fatal error is detected, however,
the processor MUST NOT continue normal processing (i.e., it MUST NOT
continue to pass character data and information about the document's
logical structure to the application in the normal way).

well-formedness constraint: Violations of well-formedness constraints
are fatal errors.
</quote>

Here are few examples of "errors" and "fatal errors" from the XML spec itself.

examples of "errors",

<quote>
1) This specification does not give meaning to any value of xml:space
other than "default" and "preserve". It is an error for other values
to be specified; the XML processor MAY report the error or MAY recover
by ignoring the attribute specification or by reporting the
(erroneous) value to the application. Applications may ignore or
reject erroneous values.
2) It is an error if an attribute value contains a reference to an
entity for which no declaration has been read.
</quote>

examples of "fatal errors",

<quote>
1. It is a fatal error for a TextDecl (i.e <?xml' VersionInfo?
EncodingDecl S? '?>) to occur other than at the beginning of an
external entity.
2. It is a fatal error if an XML entity is determined (via default,
encoding declaration, or higher-level protocol) to be in a certain
encoding but contains byte sequences that are not legal in that
encoding.
</quote>

I hope this is helpful.

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear List Members
> I'm writing a short introduction to XML and would like to have a good
> example of each of the above that doesn't require too much background
> knowledge. So far I've covered the basics of a well-formed document,
> creating elements and attributes. I've shied away from the intricacies of
> DTDs as they are covered in a�separate�article. Namespaces are also to
> be�covered�later so any examples would preferably be unrelated to either of
> these two areas.
> According to the XML specification a processor may recover from an error
> that's not described as fatal although in my experience most parsers don't
> try to do this, would I be wrong here? - and if so what would an example be
> for something like Saxon or one of the netter known parsers?
> Thanks

--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php