XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Benefits of polyglot XHTML5

David Carlisle wrote:

> ..., however more useful in a ployglot context is to not place the
> entire script in a comment but just to place a CDATA section start tag
> in a (javascript) comment and not place the script inside a comment.
> <script>
> \\<![CDATA[
> a < b
> \\]]
> </script>
> works identically in html and xhtml, and is just banned in ployglot as
> the parse tree is not identical, even though the only difference is two
> javascript comments ignored by the javascript processor.

How can you write "however more useful in a polyglot context" and then
end up saying: "and is just banned in polyglot..."?

Does it mean that we should use it in polyglot anyway or what?

Cheers
Jesper Tverskov
http://www.xmlplease.com


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS