[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: When you create a markup language, what do your parent elementsmean? What do your children elements mean?
- From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:49:39 -0400
Hi Folks,
These two markup languages have a consistent definition of what parent elements and child elements mean:
1. RDF
2. GML
Both languages specify that parent elements represent a resource or object and child elements represent properties or attributes.
Are those the only markup languages that have a consistent definition of what parent elements and child elements mean?
If one is creating a markup language and wants to adopt a consistent definition for parent elements and child elements, is resource/object and property/attribute the only way to accomplish it?
Is an Object-Oriented approach to markup the only viable approach when one wants to have a consistent definition for parent elements and child elements? That would be quite astonishing, given that people such as Tim Bray argue that "XML is 180 degrees apart from OO".
/Roger
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]