XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
RE: When you create a markup language, what do your parent elementsmean? What do your children elements mean?

Hi Folks,

These two markup languages have a consistent definition of what parent elements and child elements mean:

1. RDF
2. GML

Both languages specify that parent elements represent a resource or object and child elements represent properties or attributes.

Are those the only markup languages that have a consistent definition of what parent elements and child elements mean?

If one is creating a markup language and wants to adopt a consistent definition for parent elements and child elements, is resource/object and property/attribute the only way to accomplish it? 

Is an Object-Oriented approach to markup the only viable approach when one wants to have a consistent definition for parent elements and child elements? That would be quite astonishing, given that people such as Tim Bray argue that "XML is 180 degrees apart from OO".

/Roger



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS