XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Two interesting comments from Michael Kay

I was just kidding around, really.  When I read it the first time, I skimmed it very fast, saw "Saxon" at the top, and "Despite all its faults..." at the bottom, and interpreted it that way, and thought it was rather funny.
Cheers!


On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org> wrote:

Ø  On that second quote he's talking about XSD.

 

Correct.

 

Sorry for the confusion.

 

/Roger

 

From: Michael Glavassevich [mailto:mrglavas@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 3:46 PM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Two interesting comments from Michael Kay

 

Chris Maloney <voldrani@gmail.com> wrote on 12/15/2011 03:37:39 PM:

> Roger,
>
> > The wonder is that despite all its faults ...
>
> It's not clear whether you're talking about Saxon or XSD!


On that second quote he's talking about XSD.

> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org
> > wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> 1. On November 4, 2011 Michael Kay wrote on the SAXON mailing list
> the following. It gives an intriguing hint about how the SAXON XSD
> validator is implemented:
>
> Saxon's validation of schema documents is in most cases driven by a
> finite state machine that is automatically generated from the content
> model in the schema for schema documents. So unless there are issues
> like the spec changing since the FSM was last generated, I'm fairly
> confident that Saxon gets this kind of thing right.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28329712
>
> 2. Today Michael made an interesting statement regarding the XML
> Schema specification:
>
> XSD is probably the most difficult spec I have read since Algol 68. The
> difference is that the more you read the Algol 68 spec, the more it
> makes sense; whereas the more you read the XSD spec, the more holes you
> find.
>
> The wonder is that despite all its faults, a large number of people are
> getting a large amount of value from it.
>
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/201112/msg00069.html
>
> /Roger
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php


Michael Glavassevich
XML Technologies and WAS Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com

E-mail: mrglavas@apache.org




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS