OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XML vocabularies

Roger, the following resources might be of interest.  Both are
(way) out of date, but provide reasonable samples for the
specified coverage.

1. Naming and Design Rules

Naming and Design Rules (NDR) Specifications
- ACORD Naming and Design Rules (NDR)
- Danish XML Project: OIOXML Naming and Design Rules
- EPA Exchange Network XML Design Rules and Conventions
- Federal XML Naming and Design Rules Project
- Global Justice XML Data Model (GJXDM) Naming and Design Rules
- Hong Kong OGCIO Interoperability Framework for E-Government
- IRS XML Naming and Design Rules
- OAGIS Naming and Design Rules (NDR)
- OASIS LegalXML Exchange Document Methodology, Naming, and Design Rules (MNDR) Subcommittee
- Universal Business Language (UBL) Naming and Design Rules
- UN/CEFACT XML Naming and Design Rules Technical Specification
- US Department of the Navy XML Naming and Design Rules
- US National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) NDR

2. Use of Camel Case for Naming XML and XML-Related Components

- Robin

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org> wrote:
Hi Folks,

I am sampling some standard XML vocabularies to see what naming convention they use. Below is what I've compiled thus far. What naming convention do you use?

1. XML Schema: all elements and attributes are camel case. Examples: maxOccurs, elementFormDefault, substitutionGroup.

2. XSLT: all elements and attributes are lower-case, dash-separated. Examples: apply-templates, exclude-result-prefixes, analyze-string.

3. Schematron: most elements and attributes are a single, lower-case word (e.g., assert, rule, pattern). There is an element and an attribute with multiple words (value-of, is-a). There are two elements that use camel case (queryBinding and defaultPhase).

Notice that Schematron isn't consistent in its naming convention. Is that a bad thing? Is it a good thing to have a consistent naming convention?

Why does XML Schema and XSLT have different naming conventions? They are both W3C technologies. Does the W3C not have a policy on naming markup?



XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php

Robin Cover
OASIS, Director of Information Services
Editor, Cover Pages and XML Daily Newslink
Email: robin@oasis-open.org
Staff bio: http://www.oasis-open.org/people/staff/robin-cover
Cover Pages: http://xml.coverpages.org/
Newsletter: http://xml.coverpages.org/newsletterArchive.html
Tel: +1 972-296-1783

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS