[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] When is an XML vocabulary too complex? The art andscience of creating large, complex vocabularies that are amenable to teaching,learning, and using.
- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:34:58 +0000
>If an XML vocabulary is large and complex, does that mean it's bad?
The world is large and complex.
If you have a large and complex XML vocabulary, it might be a symptom
that you've bitten off too large a problem and you should tackle
something smaller. Or it might be a symptom that you've failed to find
the right levels of abstraction. (Though I think some XML vocabularies -
XBRL and HL7 come to mind - suffer from being too abstract.) In general
though, it might just indicate that you're tackling a large and complex
problem.
It would be a brave person who claimed that GML is too large and
complex, for example. Given the problem they have chosen to tackle,
which bits would you leave out?
Michael Kay
Saxonica
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]