OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean?

On 26/02/2012 14:11, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> Every schema language (DTD, XSD, RNG) has the notion of optional -- optional elements and optional attributes.

XML DTD does not.
In DTD attributes may be #IMPLIED or #FIXED and may have a default 
value, any of these declarations might colloquially be called declaring 
the attribute to be optional, but they have precise meanings given in 
the xml spec, so you don't have to worry about what optional means.

 > I've listed three possible meanings of "optional":
 >     -- In the first meaning, it indicates:  of-lesser-importance.
 >     -- In the second meaning, it indicates:  irrelevance.
 >     -- In the third meaning, it indicates:  lack-of-knowledge.
 > So what does "optional" really mean?

in Relax NG (and XSD, probably, but I try to avoid thinking about that)
It doesn't mean any of those things. It just means (for attributes) that 
the attribute may be omitted from an instance.

so if the bar attribute is declared with "?" then

<foo> and <foo bar="">

are both valid. There is no indication of the _meaning_  implied by 
omitting an attribute, just as there is no indication of the meaning 
implied by any particular element name.

the role of the schema is just to say what syntax is or is not valid, it 
doesn't say anything about when or why you should use any of the syntax 
options that are valid.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS