[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean?
- From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- To: "'John Cowan'" <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, "'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:40:56 -0600
Although derivable from the three: not yet or not now. Irrelevant seems
prejudicial but not wrong. Lack of knowledge is fundamental
Shannon/Boltzman.
len
-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@ccil.org] On Behalf Of John Cowan
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 2:45 PM
To: Costello, Roger L.
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean?
Costello, Roger L. scripsit:
> I've listed three possible meanings of "optional":
>
> -- In the first meaning, it indicates: of-lesser-importance.
>
> -- In the second meaning, it indicates: irrelevance.
>
> -- In the third meaning, it indicates: lack-of-knowledge.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]