[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Literate Programming ... Literate XML Schema?
- From: "=?utf-8?b?Vy4gSHVnaCBDaGF0ZmllbGQ=?=" <csi2000@urbanmarket.com>
- To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:46:32 -0400
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:44:30 +0000, "Costello, Roger L."
<costello@mitre.org> wrote:
Hi Folks,
>
> XML Schema is a high structured language, with well-establish
> semantics. Its precision is appealing as it provides a
> near-mathematical way to specify things. However it suffers from
> being incomprehensible to most Subject Matter Experts (SMEs).
>
So true. Before schemas, the one tool I found invaluable for
discussing model design (via DTD's) with subject matter experts was
"Near & Far Designer". It allowed us to explore g the overall and
detailed pictorial representations of the model. A pictorial tree
structure was a no-brainer compared to getting SME's to look at DTD
code or read a text document. Of course - I tend to be a picture
rather than a text person anyways.
An active pictorial representation of a schema - accompanied by a
literate XML schema (i.e. documentation that an SME could read). Is
that even a possibility?
Cheers...Hugh
CyberSpace Industries 2000 Inc.
XML Training and Consulting
Documentary/Multimedia Productions
http://cyberspace-industries-2000.com
UBL is in your future: http://goUBL.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]