[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Performance comparisons of tree models
- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:45:56 -0400
Michael Kay scripsit:
> I have been doing some performance comparisons of different Java XML
> tree models, as used by Saxon, and the results may be of general
> interest:
>
> http://dev.saxonica.com/blog/mike/2012/09/index.html#000194
Indeed they are. I'm glad to see that, of all the models other
than the built-in TinyTree, XOM comes up best overall.
--
No, John. I want formats that are actually John Cowan
useful, rather than over-featured megaliths that http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
address all questions by piling on ridiculous cowan@ccil.org
internal links in forms which are hideously
over-complex. --Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]