XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Why does validation fail with a named ENTITY forcarriage return and line feed?

Hi John,

Yes, I know it is more complicated. In fact, I am implementing RFC 5322. Here is my actual ENTITY declaration:

<!ENTITY from "From:&mailbox-list;&CRLF;">

Any ideas on an answer to my question?

/Roger

-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@ccil.org] On Behalf Of John Cowan
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 12:49 PM
To: Costello, Roger L.
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Why does validation fail with a named ENTITY for carriage return and line feed?

Costello, Roger L. scripsit:

> I want to specify the format of a "From:" field for email messages. The
> requirement is:

I realize this is only an example, but the definition of what can appear
in a "From:" line is *much* more complicated.  See RFC 2822.

-- 
I suggest you solicit aid of my followers       John Cowan
or learn the difficult art of mud-breathing.    cowan@ccil.org
        --Great-Souled Sam                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS