XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Application of Postel's Principle to XML


On 16/02/2013 22:02, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
B5FEE00B53CF054AA8439027E8FE17751E7025F0@IMCMBX04.MITRE.ORG" type="cite">

Hi Folks,

 

I recently came across this statement in a requirement's document:

 

Verify using XPath that there are no elements or attributes

in an XML document with more than X amount of characters.

 

That seemingly simple requirement has ambiguities that senders and receivers must wrestle with. Here are the ambiguities:

 

1. Does "X amount of characters" include whitespace?

2. Can the XML contain mixed content?

Yet another irritating question from Roger, which like most of his others will probably lead to an interesting discussion.

First the irritation -

(a) what on earth is the point of posting an absurdly imprecise requirements statement and then telling us it's imprecise? Of course it is, so what?

(b) Postel's law has nothing to do with how you deal with an imprecise specification. It assumes that the specification is clear, and suggests that you don't insist that your input conforms to it.

Michael Kay
Saxonica

B5FEE00B53CF054AA8439027E8FE17751E7025F0@IMCMBX04.MITRE.ORG" type="cite">





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS