[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
W3C TAG on JSON, XML processing
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:16:30 -0400
Stephen pointed to this in a recent post - I think the larger
conversation is well worth including here as well.
My favorite quote: "POSTPONED expresses a feeling of guilt. But there's
no guilt."
There's an interesting contrast between this and my take that
transformations are the great part of XML culture, as well.
Thanks,
--
Simon St.Laurent
http://simonstl.com/
From: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013Apr/0006.html>
<trackbot> ISSUE-34 -- XML Transformation and composability
(e.g., XSLT,XInclude, Encryption) -- open
<trackbot> [17]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/34
[17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/34
Noah: Lets go through the issues and see which we can close.
... Processing model of XML. Is there any interest in this?
<ht> xmlFunctions-34
Tim: I'm happy to do things with XML. This came from when we're
talking about XML was processed. The meaning from XML has to be
taken outside-in. Otherwise you cannot create new XML
specifications that interweave with what exist.
... Not clear people noticed that.
<noah> I note that traceker has several status codes we can
assign, including OPEN, PENDING, REVIEW, POSTPONED, and CLOSED.
Tim: Henry did a lot more work on that. I don't feel we need to
put a whole lot of energy into XML at all. JSON is the new way
for me. It's much more straightforward.
<noah> Suggestion: if we think this is now resolved or
uninteresting, CLOSE it; if we think it's interesting but not
now, then POSTPONED?
Tim: We need another concept besides OPEN/CLOSED. Something
like NOT WORKING ON IT.
Noah: It has POSTPONED.
Tim: POSTPONED expresses a feeling of guilt. But there's no
guilt.
Noah: It's close enough and I'm not looking forward to changing
Tracker.
<Zakim> ht, you wanted to add 0.02USD
Henry: I'm happy to move this to the backburner. I think
there's a genuine issue here and of interest to the community
but I don't have the bandwidth.
Noah: We need to tell ourselves a story as to what these codes
mean.
... Historically we used CLOSED for "it's in pretty good
shape".
Henry: I'm happy with POSTPONED and it's better than CLOSED.
<slightlyoff_> +1 for postponing
<JeniT> +1
RESOLUTION: We mark ISSUE-34 (xmlFunctions-34) POSTPONED
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]