XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Testing XML don't use xUnit

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It sounds like you are suggesting it's bad to have xpaths in junit
>>> tests?  ...and to use Schematron instead?
>>>
>>
>> Yes. Because changes to the structure of the xml will break the JUnit
>> test whereas Schematron assertions are resilient to that.
>
> Obviously if the test needs to handle the possibility of different
> structures, then just use the appropriate xpath / xquery in the test
> (!)
>
> If I'm missing something here, please provide an example.
>

I'm not sure what you think you might be missing because your previous
response suggested you got it.

As far as possible you want your tests to carry on working unchanged
if the structure of the XML changes. That will not happen if your test
cases expose Xpaths.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS