[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Testing XML don't use xUnit
- From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com>
- To: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:45:03 +0100
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm completely bemused.
>>
>> So am I :)
>>
>>
>> Yes, the primary purpose of unit tests is to be able to fail. An unit
>> test that always passes is useless.
>>
>
I think some of the bemusement is because the development community
have (mis)appropriated unit testing as a development methodology (the
mis is my opinion).
The primary purpose of testing (all levels of testing) is risk
mitigation. In that context it is easy to see why a test that fails
when there is no bug is useless.
It isn't mitigating any risk.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]