XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] JSON - The Fat Free Alternative - Redux

> 
> 
> So, what about using XSLT 3.0 native capabilities for processing JSON:
> 
>     http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-xslt-30-20141002/#json
> 
> BTW, Congratulations for the XSLT WG for rolling out a 2nd Last Call
> draft today!
> 

One of the interesting possibilities is to implement json-to-xml() by creating an optimized tree structure as the representation of the resulting XDM instance. I can imagine this being quite efficient compared with a general-purpose XDM implementation, for example because the @key attribute values are known to be unique. (The current Saxon implementation, however, creates a general-purpose tree.)

Michael Kay
Saxonica


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS