[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Achieving interoperability in a world where different OS's represent newline differently
- From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
- To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>,"xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 21:58:37 -0500
At 2014-12-13 14:11 +0000, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
Each operating system has its own convention for signifying the end
of a line of text:
... and so I think you should be referring to these constructs as
end-of-line sequences and not use the noun "newline". I've
encountered problems with the noun "newline" due to the end-of-line
sequence for DOS being comprised of two characters and not one.
Please let me know of any errors or confusion in the above explanation.
I hope this is helpful.
. . . . . . Ken
--
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/video.htm |
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/ |
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com |
Google+ profile: http://plus.google.com/+GKenHolman-Crane/about |
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]