Re: [xml-dev] Defining a language using itself

[John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Geert Bormans <geert@gbormans.telenet.be> wrote:

Do you know of other languages that are defined using the language itself?

/Roger

French?

To take this answer more seriously than it was meant: Natural languages are at best described, not defined.  We can't begin to provide a complete specification of any natural language as yet. 

--

GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures