There seems to be something wrong with the type evaluation of Saxon 9.1JWhen I evaluate this:/.. instance of item()the result is:false()As item() is the root of the type system and every possible value is an item(), the above result means that /.. has type that isn't defined anywhere in the type system.Seems this has something to do with the "highest possible derived type", or is just a bug.Also, we do need a type-of(expr) function.Any thoughts, please?
--Cheers,Dimitre Novatchev---------------------------------------Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.---------------------------------------To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk-------------------------------------Never fight an inanimate object-------------------------------------To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be thebiggest mistake of all------------------------------------Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.-------------------------------------You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play-------------------------------------To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.-------------------------------------Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.-------------------------------------Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they write all patents, too? :)-------------------------------------Sanity is madness put to good use.-------------------------------------I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.