|
The unofficial compact syntax for XSD <http://dret.net/projects/xscs> is even simpler: element altitude { (xs:string) required attribute units {"feet", "meters"} } I like it! Are there validating engines which validate XML instances against schemas that are specified using this compact syntax? Are people using this compact syntax in real-world applications? /Roger From: John Cowan [mailto:johnwcowan@gmail.com]
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org> wrote:
element altitude { (xs:string) required attribute units {"feet", "meters"} } XSD has plenty of problems, but it shouldn't be blamed for the verboseness of XML as a language notation. -- GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures |