[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: embodying understanding
- From: ht@markup.co.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- To: Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:10:34 +0100
Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> writes:
> On 06/11/2016 07:22 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
>> I found this statement by Eliot to be particularly profound:
>>
>> ** Understanding can be embodied in code. **
>
> Me, too.
I've been struck by a particular kind of understanding which is
embodied in code. I've been struck, in the course of my long-running
efforts to understand just what kind of identifiers URIs are, given
how unsatisfactory I find the various more-or-less official stories
that purport to address this question, by how particularly robust, and
proof _against_ the vicissitudes of domain name loss, XML namespace
URIs are. I claim that e.g.
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
identifies the XHTML language and _will continue to do so_, even if
w3.org is no longer controlled by the W3C or any successor, and
regardless of what, if anything, is served in response to a GET
request for that URI. Why? Because when browsers get an HTTP
response with a .../xml or application/xml+html media type and that
namespace URI on the document element, they process the document _as
XHTML_.
That is, the browser code embodies an understanding of that URI.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, Markup Systems Ltd.
Cavers Garden Farm, Denholm; by Hawick; TD9 8LN
+44 (0) 7866 471 388
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@markup.co.uk
URL: http://www.markup.co.uk/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]